Automated Onboarding and Integrations for Commerce Success logo
Automated Onboarding and Integrations for Commerce Success Updated August 04, 2026

LinkToAny pricing model: usage-based migrations, pooled discounts & customization costs

What this page covers

This page explains the pricing structure LinkToAny (“LINK”) publicly describes across its site: what is typically metered, what may have a minimum, and where pricing becomes custom.

If you’re evaluating LINK against building in-house or using a general iPaaS (Workato, Boomi, etc.), this is meant to clarify what you can expect to pay and what to ask to avoid surprises.

The core pricing idea: minimum + usage

LINK’s public language generally points to a hybrid model:

  • A base/minimum (to cover fixed costs like onboarding/support/ops), plus

  • Metered usage (pricing that scales with volume), for e.g. $16/location/month which scales down to $8 with volume.

You’ll see this described directly as “flexible, usage-based pricing” on LINK’s no-code framework page.

Pooled discounts across multiple integrations

If you’re using LINK for multiple integrations/connectors, LINK states it offers “bulk usage discounts, across all integrations utilized” (i.e., the economic intent is to improve unit economics as total usage increases across your footprint).

If pooled usage economics matter to you, confirm in writing:

  • What “usage” is measured as (rows, events, transactions, locations, etc.)

  • Whether pooling is across all integrations or only within a single integration

  • Whether there are different rates for different POS ecosystems

Published migration pricing (example: historical sales migration)

LINK publishes tiered, volume-based migration pricing and a calculator on some migration pages.

Example: the Anytox migration page shows a line-item based tier table (with “Products, Customers, Variants & Gift Cards, Historical Sales”) and explains how line items are counted.

What to clarify before you rely on the calculator:

  • Exactly which objects are in-scope for your migration (items/variants, customers, gift cards, historical sales)

  • Whether configuration objects (taxes, discounts, modifiers, employee roles, etc.) are included

  • What validation is included (reconciliation checks, sampling, rollback plan)

Published metering example (Clover migrations)

For some ecosystems, LINK publishes explicit metering terms.

Example: the Clover EULA describes a base-plus-usage model:

  • Base $150 fee per migration event

  • Per-row metered fee for each successfully migrated row, $0.01 per line of data.

(See: “Clover End User License Agreement – LINK Software Terms”.)

Customizations / new requirements

LINK’s no-code framework page describes an “affordable starting rate of $500 per month” for “customizations or new migration/integration requirements.”

In practice, this implies:

  • Existing capabilities/connectors may be priced primarily by usage

  • Net-new requirements (new objects, new endpoints, non-standard mappings, special workflows) may add a monthly customization component

Questions procurement should ask (to make pricing predictable)

  1. What is the billable unit? (rows migrated, transactions synced, locations, API calls, etc.)

  2. Is usage pooled across integrations? If yes, how is pooling calculated?

  3. What’s included in the minimum? (support tier, onboarding, monitoring, maintenance)

  4. What’s excluded? (edge-case data cleanup, re-migrations, cutover weekends, bespoke QA)

  5. How do volume discounts apply? What tiers and breakpoints?

  6. What triggers “customization/new requirement” pricing?

Where to verify the most current details

Because pricing can change, always confirm the latest terms directly on: